|
Post by lambethgull on Dec 20, 2012 7:37:13 GMT
i hope the knew enquiry will cover ALL angles. I'm sure the families want the prosecution of the police, FA, club etc but will they look at the role of the fans (with or without tickets, alcohol etc etc). It needs to be fair from all angles. We hear about policemen quaking in their boots over possible recrimination after all these years but could we trace the fans that caused the crushing of the innocent? If you entered a area that was full of people, would you push and push till someone else got crushed?? A horrible set of circumstances that everyone wishes didn't happen but the sanctimonious scousers annoy me. Everyone stand up and take you portion of the blame But lying, slandering, coppers don't?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2012 8:03:44 GMT
StuartB makes a fair point here and I can't see any sign of him standing up for lying police officers. While it is likely that the South Yorkshire Police and the Wednesday are going to emerge badly it would hardly be reasonable not to examine the actions of those fans who evidently rushed into the overcrowded section.
The Sun's "Truth" story, heaping all the blame onto the Liverpool fans, was appalling rubbish and was obviously fed to them by SYP but should not divert the inquiry from apportioning blame to some of those supporters should they be found to be culpable.
It's all too easy to brand all the cops as baddies and all the fans as goodies even though this seems to be the prevalent opinion on Merseyside. Logic and experience tells us that in any football crowd there will be a proportion that enters the ground late and worse for wear after drinking too much ale. In a 2000 gate that's not going to be a huge problem but a semi-final crowd is something else and I think it's fair to guess that Liverpool FC (in 1989 especially) attract more of that kind of fan than most other clubs.
The fact that the victims were all Liverpool supporters is a Scouse tragedy but that's no reason for giving the rest a free pardon, surely.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Dec 20, 2012 9:24:49 GMT
StuartB makes a fair point here and I can't see any sign of him standing up for lying police officers. Appreciate the role of hand-holder and all round good-egg comes naturally, but my question was to StuartB.
|
|
|
Post by stuartB on Dec 20, 2012 12:09:18 GMT
StuartB makes a fair point here and I can't see any sign of him standing up for lying police officers. Appreciate the role of hand-holder and all round good-egg comes naturally, but my question was to StuartB. no one holding my hand anyway.... what he said
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Dec 20, 2012 19:14:40 GMT
Let's not forget that South Yorkshire police already believed that they were above the law and had a licence to treat crowds of people like dirt because they had done exactly the same thing during the miners' strike of 1984/5, in which hundreds of miners were arrested on trumped up charges and deliberately provoked by having payslips waved in their faces. In their arrogance they really thought that they could treat the disaster as a public order matter (including beating back people trying to climb over the fences to escape) and then cover up their incompetence with a conspiracy of lies. I share the above view, but that doesn't mean I consider the police to be wholly responsible for events that day. Sheffield Wednesday, the emergency services, the FA - all share culpability. StuartB says the issue of drunken and tickeletless Liverpool fans should be investigated, but this is a question already considered by the Hillsborough Independent Panel: Wildebeeste points out that an FA Cup semi-final crowd is different to a crowd of 2,000. He's absolutely right. That's why the match should have been handled in a way that managed the risks and ensured that men, women and children in attendance were able to return home without being seriously injured or worse. Consider the following scenario. A larger than expected crowd of New Years Eve revellers swarm towards Oxford Street underground station in the early hours. Drinks have been had and the crowd, like any late night crowd, is not the most receptive to instructions. But instead of the appropriate steps and contingency measures being in place to manage the crowds – adequate numbers of trained staff on hand, a full number of entry and exit points being open, procedures to keep people outside when capacity is exceeded inside - police and underground workers let everyone in. Capacity on the platforms is exceeded, 20 people end up on the track and an oncoming train causes several fatalities. A resulting stampede leads to scores more serious injuries. In the following days police and local politicians inform the media that the stampede and crush was caused by " drugged up and drunken teenagers fighting", there are reports of bystanders " pickpocketing and urinating on survivors" and members of the crowd " assaulting the emergency services". Statements from the police and London Underground staff are considered by the Coroner in reaching his verdicts. 25 years later, an independent report finds no evidence to substantiate any of the allegations reported after the event. It's revealed that the station manager ignored safety warnings and previous 'near-misses'. There was inadequate liaison between London Underground, police and emergency services. Operational mistakes were made by underground staff and police who were not properly briefed or trained. It's also revealed that hundreds of statements provided to the Coroner by the authorities were doctored. In short, nobody has been held to account for events that morning. StuartB – do you think your tune would change if someone close to you was caught up in that?
|
|
|
Post by stuartB on Dec 20, 2012 20:15:29 GMT
why does my "tune" need to change? All I'm saying is that it must be investigated from every angle.
I remember as a kid at the real grammar school, pushing and shoving to desperately get on a school bus and we were free from alcohol. We did not think of the people being crushed ahead of us. We all survived but if someone had been injured I'm sure my conscience would still be pricked now.
so are there any fans feeling guilty for their actions? the police, stewards, club officials or FA did not push and push till someone was crushed to death.
Everyone must take their portion of the blame and therefore everything must be looked at
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Dec 20, 2012 20:37:16 GMT
why does my "tune" need to change? All I'm saying is that it must be investigated from every angle. I remember as a kid at the real grammar school, pushing and shoving to desperately get on a school bus and we were free from alcohol. We did not think of the people being crushed ahead of us. We all survived but if someone had been injured I'm sure my conscience would still be pricked now. so are there any fans feeling guilty for their actions? the police, stewards, club officials or FA did not push and push till someone was crushed to death. Everyone must take their portion of the blame and therefore everything must be looked at Have you read the Hillsborough Independent Panel's report?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2012 21:01:21 GMT
But this is not quite an exoneration of all the Liverpool supporters. The panel found no evidence but it is possible that some evidence will emerge from a full inquiry which hasn't been heard yet. The panel's reference to exceptional levels of drunkenness and ticketlessness suggests that there were some drunken and ticketless fans, which would be to be expected among such a throng. Similarly, I haven't heard anyone ever suggest that the fans conspired to turn up late and force entry but that doesn't mean that none of them actually did so. I must say it is shocking to visit Hillsborough 23 years on and to find that the notorious Leppings Lane stand is still in situ. It is still horribly dangerous, the concourse is always packed out and the gangways to the seats are way too narrow. I am amazed there haven't been more deaths and serious injuries there since 1989. In addition, the stewards there are among the most aggressive and unpleasant anywhere in the League. The best tribute to the fans would be to demolish the entire end and build something safer and less oppressive, preferably to include a proper memorial and an admission of SWFC's culpability in the disaster.
|
|
|
Post by stuartB on Dec 20, 2012 21:24:38 GMT
why does my "tune" need to change? All I'm saying is that it must be investigated from every angle. I remember as a kid at the real grammar school, pushing and shoving to desperately get on a school bus and we were free from alcohol. We did not think of the people being crushed ahead of us. We all survived but if someone had been injured I'm sure my conscience would still be pricked now. so are there any fans feeling guilty for their actions? the police, stewards, club officials or FA did not push and push till someone was crushed to death. Everyone must take their portion of the blame and therefore everything must be looked at Have you read the Hillsborough Independent Panel's report? NO, and I don't intend to, that is the job of the official inquiry to take in all evidence. i don't have to prove or disprove anything. Please don't turn this into a pointless argument or inflame a situation with head banging things. All I'm saying (no head banging thingy) is that they need to look at EVERYTHING, like they should have done in the first place
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Dec 20, 2012 21:26:29 GMT
All I'm saying (no head banging thingy) is that they need to look at EVERYTHING, like they should have done in the first place And you know know they didn't look at everything because you haven't read the report.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Dec 20, 2012 21:27:44 GMT
The panel's reference to exceptional levels of drunkenness and ticketlessness suggests that there were some drunken and ticketless fans, which would be to be expected among such a throng Yes, it would be expected. It happens at every major sporting event in this country.
|
|
|
Post by stuartB on Dec 20, 2012 21:30:58 GMT
All I'm saying (no head banging thingy) is that they need to look at EVERYTHING, like they should have done in the first place And you know know they didn't look at everything because you haven't read the report. please send me your home address, so i can send you a new bone for Christmas
|
|
JamesB
TFF member
Posts: 1,526
|
Post by JamesB on Dec 20, 2012 21:41:26 GMT
I think it's fair to say the fact that people got crushed to death suggests not everyone was standing in a nice orderly queue. It is worth reminding people of that, though I would suggest that it's got to the point where if you say anything slightly derogatory about the actions of Liverpool fans on that day, many of them today go apeshit. But then again, many do that when you accuse their racist player of being racist so...
That being said, it should be quite clear that the main failings were that of the organisation, i.e. the police, the FA, the club etc. You get impatient fans and drunk fans at every football match but not only 1 in the last few decades here has ended up with 96 people dying
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Dec 20, 2012 23:02:03 GMT
Have you read the Hillsborough Independent Panel's report? I'm STILL halfway through it!
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Dec 20, 2012 23:07:49 GMT
so are there any fans feeling guilty for their actions? the police, stewards, club officials or FA did not push and push till someone was crushed to death. From my experiences of being in (far far less serious) crowd crushes, you have no choice whatsoever whether to keep going forward. It was the job of the police and / or stewards NOT to keep directing supporters into a ridiculously overcrowded section of the ground. The fact that they failed to do their job is not the fault of the fans. I am quite sure that any fan stuck in that crush at Hillsborough will still feel traumatised and even have a sense of guilt at not being able to stop moving forward - but there was absolutely nothing they could have done to prevent it.
|
|