Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2009 17:40:53 GMT
looks like we may well be getting another 75 grand pay day, Chesterfied have agreed to sell Jamie Ward to Barnsley for 400 grand it just needs personal terms to be sorted and a medical Was it not Roberts who did the deal with the sell on thing maybe he was not so bad after all ;D www.chesterfield-fc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10435~1511882,00.html |
|
|
|
Post by jmgull on Jan 7, 2009 18:16:02 GMT
...Had Roberts not sold him, we would have still struggled to stay up but his goals might have given us a fair chance, he was on fire at the start of that season, he was a few months into a 3.5 yr contract if you remember, so he was sold far too cheaply.
His sale was effectively the nail in the coffin of our 80 yr league status.
75k doesn't soften that blow.
|
|
|
|
Post by aussie on Jan 7, 2009 18:17:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by aussie on Jan 7, 2009 18:19:04 GMT
Dartgull think before you type please as you probably meant well in doing so you have pissed a few people right off!!
|
|
|
|
Post by chrish on Jan 7, 2009 18:23:06 GMT
Dartgull think before you type please as you probably meant well in doing so you have pissed a few people right off!! I think you should do the same. Think before you type. Try reading it again. I think the smiley face is supposed to depict irony. |
|
|
|
Post by aussie on Jan 7, 2009 18:29:25 GMT
That smiley face to me looks like its rather glad about something pal!
|
|
|
|
Post by tufcwewillbeback on Jan 7, 2009 18:43:28 GMT
Is'nt 25% of 400 grand 100 grand?  ?? |
|
chelstongull
TFF member
Posts: 6,759
Favourite Player: Jason Fowler
|
Post by chelstongull on Jan 7, 2009 18:52:40 GMT
Would have to agree with jmgull and Aussie - the bloke was an insane Walter Mitty cash grabbing tos8er ( allegedly). He should have been nailed to the cross in front of the popside and let the birds peck his eyes out.  Evil............. |
|
|
|
Post by gullsdiv2 on Jan 7, 2009 18:58:08 GMT
Is'nt 25% of 400 grand 100 grand? ?? its 25% of the profit made so we sold him for £90,000 i think which means we get 25% of £310,000 |
|
|
|
Post by chrish on Jan 7, 2009 19:22:52 GMT
That smiley face to me looks like its rather glad about something pal! Glad because it's happy to have made a sentence ironic. Dear god man. Do I have to spell it out?  |
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Jan 7, 2009 19:40:15 GMT
Dartgull think before you type please as you probably meant well in doing so you have pissed a few people right off!! I think you should do the same. Think before you type. Try reading it again. I think the smiley face is supposed to depict irony. aussie mate I have to agree with Chris on this one, I'm sure Dartgull felt the same way about Roberts as we all did and the smile in my view does depict irony, as no one in the right minds would ever think Roberts did anything that was good for our club. |
|
jerry
TFF member
Posts: 165
|
Post by jerry on Jan 7, 2009 20:13:53 GMT
We are due 25% of the profit Chesterfield make.
They have a sell on clause of their own.
If Barnsley sell him for £5 million some time in the future they could be looking at 25% of £4.6 million (£1.15 million if my maths is right).
Do we have a 25% claim on that (£287,500) as well seeing as it is "profit" for them on the deal?
Sorry if I'm being stupid here, just not sure how far down the line these deals go. Somewhere in the back of my mind is a nagging memory about money we got from subsequent Darren Moore transfers (but it may be my mind playing tricks!)
|
|
|
|
Post by ohtobeatplainmoor on Jan 7, 2009 21:04:53 GMT
With the Darren Moore sell-on, we lost-out because Donny sold-out the clause to Bradford for a pretty nominal fee as they were strapped for cash (we got a percentage of this small amount!), so Doncaster didn't profit when he moved to Portsmouth.
I am holding my breath until the figures are announced. Would anyone be surprised if it was announced that roberts negotiated the "sale" of the sell-on clause for some quick cash (£5k or something!) before he went?
|
|
jerry
TFF member
Posts: 165
|
Post by jerry on Jan 7, 2009 22:18:09 GMT
With the Darren Moore sell-on, we lost-out because Donny sold-out the clause to Bradford for a pretty nominal fee as they were strapped for cash (we got a percentage of this small amount!), so Doncaster didn't profit when he moved to Portsmouth. So does that mean we could be entitled to something if and when Ward moves again? |
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,913
|
Post by Jon on Jan 7, 2009 22:35:58 GMT
So does that mean we could be entitled to something if and when Ward moves again? Yes. |
|
??
