|
Post by hullgull on Apr 5, 2014 16:42:31 GMT
Well Si I think Tonge just chipped it back to the keeper Mrs Slocombe in the center of the goal and she was in Are you being Served. Its so bad I honestly think some of the players are playing badly on purpose so i have come to the conclusion it has to be spot fixing. If that isn't the case they all need to go and see a shrink to sort out their psychological state of mind and that includes the manager. Ha ha Pete....laughing your post mate......at the mo it seems it's like comedy sitcom at the moment......oh I have some great tablets and a number of a good shrink....joking aside mate am Feckin gutted....si
|
|
|
Post by frankfurt gull on Apr 5, 2014 16:44:30 GMT
Whenever I took a penalty (many years ago) I just whacked the pill as hard as I could and even if he got a hand to it the goalie would probably fly into the net with the ball. Don´t think I ever missed one that I can recall!
|
|
petef
Match Room Manager
Posts: 4,626
|
Post by petef on Apr 5, 2014 16:46:58 GMT
Well Si I think Tonge just chipped it back to the keeper Mrs Slocombe in the center of the goal and she was in Are you being Served. Its so bad I honestly think some of the players are playing badly on purpose so i have come to the conclusion it has to be spot fixing. If that isn't the case they all need to go and see a shrink to sort out their psychological state of mind and that includes the manager. Ha ha Pete....laughing your post mate......at the mo it seems it's like comedy sitcom at the moment......oh I have some great tablets and a number of a good shrink....joking aside mate am Feckin gutted....si Maybe its us that need to see the shrink si. Glad I made you smile bud.
|
|
|
Post by hullgull on Apr 5, 2014 16:55:53 GMT
Ha ha Pete....laughing your post mate......at the mo it seems it's like comedy sitcom at the moment......oh I have some great tablets and a number of a good shrink....joking aside mate am Feckin gutted....si Maybe its us that need to see the shrink si. Glad I made you smile bud. Got to laugh bout this mate....you couldn't write this script.....can you all answer this for me please guys.....why arnt the strikers fighting for the ball to take the pen....you might well be right Pete....match fixing....a lot of questions need to be answered over this game.....si
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Apr 5, 2014 17:10:08 GMT
Here's one I made earlier: It would be typical of us to dominate the game, fail to score, let in a sloppy goal and lose 1-0.
|
|
|
Post by Swanny on Apr 5, 2014 17:11:44 GMT
Well what another joke that turned out to be! Yet another 1-0 defeat, yet again we can't score, and what is getting more worrying for me are the decisions made by Hargreaves. There were some really bizarre decicions made today, none more so than the decision made to give Tonge the job of taking our penalty today. No-one could believe that Tonge, who has been pretty awful all season and lacking in confidence, was given the all important task. As feared his penalty was easily saved, unlike Scunthorpe's penalty that won the match. Crowd 2,234, 260 odd from Scunthorpe. Sponsors MOTM and Twitter MOTM Spurs loanee Coulthirst.
Torquay's opening was very good forcing several early corners. Cameron did one lovely run and shot that clipped the crossbar. Both Torquay's wingers, Cameron and Coulthirst, looked our most likely source with their movement and Torquay were the better team but typically could not force the opening goal. Then on 31 minutes Scunthorpe who had hardly threatened won a penalty after Mansell clipped one of their players. It was probably a harsh decision as it appeared Scunthorpe handled the ball just prior to the incident. Winnall put the penalty away with confidence giving Rice no chance. But the big pivotal point was Torquay's penalty after Pearce was fouled from a corner. Tonge was giving the task and shot weakly from the spot and was comfortably saved. Just like against Exeter earlier in the season Torquay blew their great chance. At half-time supporters were up in arms that Tonge was the penalty taker.
Torquay did not threaten too much with clear chances in the second half. Substitute Stockley had our best effort from a free-kick that their keeper tipped over the bar. We did get into promising positions and Coulthirst always looked a threat. Hawley was putting in a pretty good shift but his strike partner Bodin was his usual frustrating self - he showed some good skill and footwork but his final delivery / shot was wasteful. As a unit Torquay played more cohesively today and seem to find their man better. Our shape and tempo was quite good for much of the game. Sadly Hawley was stretchered off with a nasty looking injury to his arm? Hawley and Cameron were replaced by Benyon and Stockley with Bodin moving to a wing. I thought torquay lost their impetus after these subs as, apart from a decent Stockley free-kick, him and Benyon never got into the game. Coulthirst was then replaced by Yeoman to boos all around Plainmoor and chants of "you don't know what you're doing" aimed at Hargreaves. In added Stockley clumsily led with his arm in a challenge and was righly sent off. Out poured the home fans, they had seen enough.
So there we have it. It was maybe one of our better performances but the same old score-line. So we won't be seeing much of Hawley and Stockley for the rest of the season. I am disappointed Coulthirst was not tried in attack today at all. I wouldhave taken off Bodin and put Coulthirst in attack. Sadly today's substitutions made things worse rather than better. I hope Hargreaves does not make a habit of this next season in the Conference...
|
|
|
Post by bristolgull on Apr 5, 2014 17:33:46 GMT
Here's one I made earlier: It would be typical of us to dominate the game, fail to score, let in a sloppy goal and lose 1-0. Made me smile...
|
|
|
Post by loyalgull on Apr 5, 2014 19:32:24 GMT
hargreaves,torquay legend,nice bloke,as torquay manager absolutely clueless,expect a long long stint in the conferance or worse.
|
|
JamesB
TFF member
Posts: 1,526
|
Post by JamesB on Apr 6, 2014 12:55:47 GMT
Just watched the highlights back. Seems as if there is some confusion about the Scunthorpe penalty - it was conceded by Pearce, not Mansell as some are reporting
Also I can't for the life of me work out why Stockley was sent off. It was even more tame than the Goodwin incident. Are the FA/referees watching us for this stuff now? Plus Benyon was being clearly fouled just before
We should have had another couple of penalties in the second half. We weren't that terrible until about an hour in, when we seemed to fade a bit. Hargreaves' changes just made it any worse. I don't see what he or anyone sees in Yeoman. The guy's Conference South level at best. Cameron and Coulthirst were the best players in the attack and we looked solid at the back. Scunthorpe were just well-organised and left plenty back. They got what they came for - a 1-0 win
I was surprised so many booed the Coulthirst substitution. The honeymoon's definitely over
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Apr 7, 2014 22:30:21 GMT
Changing the subject completely have i read somewhere that the pop side was named because there was a line of poplar trees behind the grass bank before the cover was built in the early fifties ? Can anyone enlighten me ? Tokyogull told me this theory - don't know if he made it up or read it somewhere. Load of nonsense in my opinion - I'll debunk it properly in the History Room. I thought they were larches anyway:
|
|
|
Post by Ditmar van Nostrilboy on Apr 8, 2014 11:55:26 GMT
Changing the subject completely have i read somewhere that the pop side was named because there was a line of poplar trees behind the grass bank before the cover was built in the early fifties ? Can anyone enlighten me ? Tokyogull told me this theory - don't know if he made it up or read it somewhere. Load of nonsense in my opinion - I'll debunk it properly in the History Room. I remember my late dad telling me the same thing about 40 years ago. Either a very poplar misconception amongst fans or could be rooted in truth... (Hat/Coat etc)
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Apr 8, 2014 22:52:39 GMT
I remember my late dad telling me the same thing about 40 years ago. Either a very poplar misconception amongst fans or could be rooted in truth... (Hat/Coat etc) Interesting to know the story goes back a few years. You rarely hear the u pronounced in popular (is that a Devon thing or the same everywhere?), so easy to see how the two words could be confused. Does anyone know if the trees actually were poplars? I couldn't tell a poplar from a larch.
|
|