Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Nov 30, 2018 0:26:12 GMT
Gordon Oliver seems absolutely determined to ignore GI's history. "I look to the future not the past" is what he repeated ad infinitum when I asked him about it. I will be charitable and put that down to stupidity rather than anything more sinister. I will rest a little more easy when the old fool is officially put out to pasture. Unfortunately, we are not free from Mr Oliver yet: ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2F9b41d9876a62f81c115159e85%2Fimages%2F9d7e67c8-0307-4877-a4f4-140fdc9a9d56.jpg&t=1543536117&ymreqid=466a1d8b-5498-06f8-2ffe-900009010000&sig=Gy7knsuZ4ujeMDMX8w7OWg--~CIf you want to remind your councillors to keep their guard up: nicole.amil@torbay.gov.uk jane.barnby@torbay.gov.uk neil.bent@torbay.gov.uk anne.brooks@torbay.gov.uk nick.bye@torbay.gov.uk christine.carter@torbay.gov.uk steve.darling@torbay.gov.uk mandy.darling@torbay.gov.uk ian.doggett@torbay.gov.uk vic.ellery@torbay.gov.uk robert.excell@torbay.gov.uk richard.haddock@torbay.gov.uk ray.hill@torbay.gov.uk mark.king@torbay.gov.uk mark.kingscote@torbay.gov.uk barbara.lewis@torbay.gov.uk chris.lewis@torbay.gov.uk terry.manning@torbay.gov.uk derek.mills@torbay.gov.uk mike.morey@torbay.gov.uk dave.morris@torbay.gov.uk james.o'dwyer@torbay.gov.uk julien.parrott@torbay.gov.uk nick.pentney@torbay.gov.uk chris.robson@torbay.gov.uk adrian.sanders@torbay.gov.uk jackie.stockman@torbay.gov.uk cindy.stocks@torbay.gov.uk di.stubley@torbay.gov.uk lynn.sykes@torbay.gov.uk john.thomas@torbay.gov.uk david.thomas@torbay.gov.uk anna.tolchard@torbay.gov.uk alan.tyerman@torbay.gov.uk thomas.winfield@torbay.gov.uk
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Dec 6, 2018 22:29:55 GMT
Wasn’t sure where to put this, but given Osborne was previously involved in talk of a new stadium at subsequently crisis hit Hereford, it’s good to see that they have announced a small profit in getting back to the level we are currently at.
I read this on BTPIR, but can’t find the original source from where it was lifted:-
“Hereford employed 29 people excluding players, managers, etc on things like programme editing, club shop, stewards, in their bars, food stalls, secretaries, etc. ~ £115,000 Wages for the players and management was ~ £332,000 plus bonuses of £48,000. Turnover was £988,770 up from £711,686 the previous season Ticket sales on matchdays £319,000 and season tickets £206,000 TV and prize money raised £122,605. Rent went up from £1.999 a season to £10,000 for a ten year lease but seasons 7 and 8 are free rent years so £8.000 a season really. Overall to win the Southern League Premier and gain promotion to National League North they made nearly a million with a NET profit of £44,938.”
“Fan owned Hereford have to live within what we generate. The untouchable kitty fund has over £600,000 in it, in shares of £1 each. Prior to the start of last season, HUST (Hereford United Supporters Trust) owned 90.000 of those shares and during the season raised enough to buy 52,000 more making them the largest shareholder in the club. The eventual dream aim is to get other rich "Sugar Daddies" on board until then there are 1M shares of which they are again the largest holder”.
Well done to the long suffering fans that have made that happen. They are again able to enjoy their team at a decent level in their Edgar Street home now secured for another 10 seasons at a favourable rent. They are finding it hard at this next level this season, but they’ve had a few promotions and a Wembley final en route to their rebirth. I wish them well as they provide some hope for all who may fall into the hands of malevolent ownership characterised by any of, the lure of ‘development potential’ and false or unfulfilled promises, debt, threats, blackmail, administration, winding up or expulsion from the League they are in.
Some would say it could never happen. It did. They turned over more than a £1m one level below us and made a small net profit. If we were ever unfortunate enough to be shafted by owners as they were, I wonder if we would be able to replicate this?
Not without Plainmoor seems the obvious answer from their experience.
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Dec 7, 2018 0:01:36 GMT
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Dec 7, 2018 2:19:19 GMT
Thanks Jon.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 9:16:54 GMT
Rob
While not doubting the accuracy of this statement for a moment (we know that Jon would have called out an inaccurate claim relating to financial figures in an instant) there are some of us less knowledgeable of accounts who will have either skipped the figures and instead accepted Rob's summing up, or are unsure of which figures need to be combined in order to reach a turnover figure in excess of £1 million. A little further clarification would be appreciated.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,232
|
Post by rjdgull on Dec 7, 2018 14:17:40 GMT
Moving back to the stadium the council voted to retain it for its designated use. link
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Dec 7, 2018 23:08:45 GMT
Rob While not doubting the accuracy of this statement for a moment (we know that Jon would have called out an inaccurate claim relating to financial figures in an instant) there are some of us less knowledgeable of accounts who will have either skipped the figures and instead accepted Rob's summing up, or are unsure of which figures need to be combined in order to reach a turnover figure in excess of £1 million. A little further clarification would be appreciated. That’s an error on my part AJ. My apologies. £988k up a fair whack (not a recognised term) on the year before. Turnover alone isn’t something to get too carried away with, of course. Even those crude salary cap rules that were all the talk a few years back don’t bring that any more seemingly in to the equation than for an ordinary business unless you are Champions League or QPR. Like Rob, I can’t find the origin of the source either which was why I threw it out here in many respects, so perhaps I shouldn’t be elaborating any further without that. I will ever so slightly, but with caution. Seems a strange ruse for someone to have simply made it up, but stranger things obviously happen. And particularly so in the context of Hereford’s not so distant past before subsequent expulsion from the Conference and a season with no football and what appeared for many an outsider to be the end of their history in somethinnother than he limited company sense. The simpler point about the ground ownership is a matter of record, that said. I hope it’s a favourable lease on those terms stated. An earlier delving into their comeback and their proving a worthy tenant will no doubt have aided that renegotiation process in any event. Making that small profit with non-playing staffing levels as they appear to aid it’s evolution and perhaps having kept hold of that £600k while on an upward trajectory compared to their past history is something I admire. It’s arguably been sustainable growth and success thusfar and, fingers crossed for them, with that very favourable lease to aid those next difficult steps. I know a bit about losing a ‘club’, as you know (I know, I said it ) and traversing the come back from losing all in that sporting sense is something close to home. It wouldn’t have been possible without fostering business links, accessing grant funding, a volunteer force, continued support when no product on the pitch and the good will of the local authority since ‘oblivion’, but when all is said and done and without going into the whole mess of the previous ‘business’, those fans have something precious back that was taken away through no fault of their own support and are looking outward in their support now in a positive way with the aim to keep Hereford on a reasonable footing going forward. It’s self determination, acquired acumen and community resolve in equal measures. It’s not perfect. I hope it works for those fans longer term and I’d like to see us beating them at home or Edgar Street at a higher level at some point in the future. No guarantees for us or them and this next step is proving more difficult on-field for them, but it’s way better than what was. Which was nothing.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,232
|
Post by rjdgull on Dec 12, 2018 21:10:46 GMT
link - I see from one of the other forums that our club owner is looking for some form of understanding with the local authority in relocating the stadium together with some form of housing deal and look forward to seeing what is put on the table. The level of football we are at is not really conducive with all these grandiose stadium plans and the recent managerial appointment to improve our position makes sense from that viewpoint. This is going to rumble on and constant vigilance is going to be needed.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,232
|
Post by rjdgull on Dec 13, 2018 18:17:35 GMT
link - MOU in draft form. No problem with this in principle but it’s ensuring the delivery of this project and what it will look like for the club subsequently as CO will be off once it has been done or as far as he is willing to take it.
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Dec 14, 2018 0:25:58 GMT
link - MOU in draft form. No problem with this in principle but it’s ensuring the delivery of this project and what it will look like for the club subsequently as CO will be off once it has been done or as far as he is willing to take it. Agree. Sounds fine, but so have all of GIs other promised stadium developments. I would be happier if there were a three-way MOU between a property developer, the council and the football club with the property developer bearing all the speculative costs of preparing plans not the football club and the football club fiercely protecting the interests of the football club. As it is, the interests of the football club are theoretically represented by the football club, but "the football club" is not interested in the medium to long-term protection of the football club - purely in furthering the financial interests of the property developer. Add in GI's appalling track record and there is every reason to remain extremely vigilant. As the Swindon councillor has learned from bitter experience: "I don’t really trust them not to build more houses and then not deliver the stadium and just sod off". At least if they do build more houses and then not deliver the stadium and just sod off and the council retains the Plainmoor freehold, there is hope for professional football in Torquay. If GI build more houses, write off their loans to Torquay United AFC Ltd (including money loaned to TUFC Ltd so that TUFC Ltd can produce property development plans) against their building profits and then not deliver the stadium and just sod off, there might even be hope for the survival of the existing football club.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,232
|
Post by rjdgull on Dec 14, 2018 9:11:15 GMT
As it is, the interests of the football club are theoretically represented by the football club, but "the football club" is not interested in the medium to long-term protection of the football club - purely in furthering the financial interests of the property developer. . Otherwise known as a conflict of interest which is not always appreciated by all parties and must somehow be robustly managed.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,232
|
Post by rjdgull on Dec 19, 2018 13:44:51 GMT
link - quite a thorough write up of the various viewpoints on the MOU which Gordon Oliver signed against the advice of the rest of the committee but not sure what it actually means going forward. Will comment on later...
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,232
|
Post by rjdgull on Dec 23, 2018 22:34:09 GMT
Bit of an oddity this memorandum of understanding as it has no financial implications for the council and is more of a measure to show support by the council for the objective of a new stadium complex but which was opposed by every member apart from the mayor whose term of office finishes next year.
Plans haven’t exactly proceeded quickly for Clark Osborne bearing in mind he took over the club two years ago and suggested a new stadium could be built in three. His initial plan was to obtain the freehold of Plainmoor but he put this on hold back in June 2017 when he encountered strong opposition but nevertheless did not rule out obtaining it as part of any new stadium deal negotiated with the local authority.
I see Kevin Mowat referred to paranoia over the Plainmoor freehold as this apparently has not arisen in discussions with Clark Osborne but hardly surprising considering what has come out of the horse’s mouth so to speak. I do wonder what has been mentioned in those discussions though and as Steve Darling asked, where is this enabling land?
Quite basic plans for the stadium, partly uplifted from elsewhere, were submitted for public consumption a few months ago and while they were little more than a concept package, for a project of this magnitude I still would have expected a bit more professional input. It was stated that a more detailed planning application was to be subsequently submitted in November which still remains to be seen and I wonder if the delay is due to the complexities of this project even at this preliminary stage that were not fully realised? It is not as if there is a long history of building stadia to draw upon. In the meantime the emphasis has been on this memorandum of understanding and I wonder if it is possibly to be used to attract investment from elsewhere?
The problem is if this complex is to be owned by the club as stated previously to allow it to compete at a higher level , what future revenue streams will there be to invest in? Secondly if the club did reach the objective of owning this complex would it then be in danger of asset stripping? Thirdly, how would its use as an events arena impact on the footballing side of things bearing in mind the trouble we had with sharing facilities with Truro this year. Are there any examples of league or premiership clubs with a similar division in the usage that works well?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2018 14:35:09 GMT
Floridagull There has been at least one obvious example this season where the markings from the American Football game hosted there, could not be 100% obliterated before the next Spurs game, but they were sufficiently faint for it not to be an issue. However, I think we should insist upon a guarantee that under no circumstances would the club host the 'Horse Of The Year Show' at The Osborne Arena within one week of a scheduled home game. Older TFF members will remember the state of the Wembley pitch for the 1970 F.A Cup Final between Leeds and Chelsea, where the pitch had been both churned up and heavily sanded for that horsey event that was staged there just days earlier. But thinking caps on, and let's see what negatives we can come up with for owning a versatile stadium capable of hosting a number of money spinning events and activities. Let's not leave it to TUST members to do all the brainwork, and remember they've got a group of loyal councillors patiently waiting for anything that can be added to the 'Against' column. Plainmoor's lack of adaptability, even holding Yellowfest with a sound system set to anything about whispering level, get's the neighbours up in arms and demanding an early finish. For the best suggestion in this thinly disguised '101 reasons why we don't want the Osborne Arena' initiative, a turkey sandwich wrapped in tinfoil may well be prize....if I remember to bring it with me to Plainmoor on Boxing Day .
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,232
|
Post by rjdgull on Jan 26, 2019 8:41:06 GMT
link - Kevin Foster’s weekly update has brief mention about the Torquay United Stadium plans with the memorandum of understanding having now been dropped.
|
|