|
Post by frobisher on Oct 18, 2009 0:01:12 GMT
I would not blame Nicholson at all - it was the managers ludicrous formation which caused the problems
|
|
|
Post by kingpin on Oct 18, 2009 1:08:44 GMT
why oh why buckle doesnt sign a natural left winger beggers belief,i agree nicholson has little pace but look at his performances when whoever plays left mid tracks back and does the job hes supposed to.every time there is a spare player and no matter what anybody says about nico getting skinned it is impossible not to when he has 2 players,we all see mansell on the right getting stuck in but he has support for when he misses or gets taken on which is why the right works better and people will disagree with me but i see our problem being the strikers.the chances we have just arent bein finished and i just dont see which 1 of our strike force are goin to score,hopefully 1 game soon i will be proved wrong and we shall win 5 nil,i no i say all we have to do is finish the chances we get but thats the point.we get the chances but we never score so then the defence get crucified by the fans,sorry if ive bored u all
|
|
hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Oct 18, 2009 7:01:21 GMT
A disappointing performance in my view, especially after the 2nd half at Notts County.
My first thought was why on earth was Charnock dropped. He is probably our best defender and those who did play were torn all over the place by a very tricky Morecambe forward line. Really they should have beaten us out of sight had it not been for another good display from Michael Poke.
Neither Robertson or Ellis have a clue what to do with the ball when they have it and it is just hoofed aimlessly forward straight into the path of the opposition. Out of the defense, only Mansell emerged with any credit, as Nicholson, sadly is being exposed as a bit out of his depth.
I would not want to join in the chorus of moaning about him as he has been a great player for us in the non-league years but I think he needs replacing.
I thought Wroe had one of his better games and while Hargreaves gives everything, maybe his time is fading too. Certainly Tyrone Thompson is not up to this level and upfront, benyon is a liability. There is just no point to him being in the team and if he does have to play, then having him as the furthest forward trying to win the aimless long hoofs from defense is a waste of time. Surely, Sills should be there and \benyonplaying behind the main striker/s.
Furthermore, the clamour for Danny Stevens is really rather pointless. He is too small for this level of football.
We were lucky to get a point even though we could have nicked it. We might be out of the relegation zone, but in reality we are further in the mire.
Buckle himself acknowledges that the current team is not good enough, although he has been saying this for a few weeks now and little seems to have been done about it. He is right in saying it has to be the right players but we cannot afford to wait around for too long. The problem is I wonder what sort of player would want to join us in our current predicament.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,227
|
Post by rjdgull on Oct 18, 2009 7:19:17 GMT
I am in no way defending his performance but Nico, outstanding last week was picked on today, his lack of pace exposed and made to look very ordinary. That does not make him a bad player or a liability but a player who needs help when teams decide to try and exploit his weaknesses. We were lucky to come away with a point today and Morcambe will feel they were unlucky not to get all three. Most of us are quick to criticize officials but when they award dubious penalties in our favour nothing said? Say no more. Maybe it is because of all the penalty shouts that are never given. Ironically, a minute after this incident, Nicholson had another throw into the box and Sills was quite clearly fouled between the defender and goal keeper - not that we were ever going to get a second decision that quick. I actually thought that the ref had a good game.
|
|
chelstongull
TFF member
Posts: 6,759
Favourite Player: Jason Fowler
|
Post by chelstongull on Oct 18, 2009 8:51:43 GMT
Most of us are quick to criticize officials but when they award dubious penalties in our favour nothing said? Say no more. I thought it was a Stonewall Jackson penalty. Admittedly you don't often see them given - the ref could (and perhaps should have) given more (to both sides) - this may then stop this shirt pulling.
|
|
petef
Match Room Manager
Posts: 4,626
|
Post by petef on Oct 18, 2009 11:38:05 GMT
We all have our opinions and one stat sadly speak for itself shots on target 9 to 16 to them against rival strugglers at home tells its own story. We were over run at times and it was becoming embarasing. After just 20 minutes it was obvious to me that with no wide outlets and an underperforming midfield and defense we would be put under pressure and struggle we did for the entire first half. We lack quality all over if you ask me and its not just Nicho who is not up to it though I personally believe as with Greavsy we would be worse off as a team without him as there are no alternatives. Thompson is an enigma and has had his chance now flashes of "perhaps he could be the answer" but totaly inconsistent. Not good enough at this level I can understand where the Danny Stevens critics are coming from but there is no doubt he had an impact and provided ballance once he came and for sure he does at least posses true technical ability on the ball one of only a few I can think of in the squad. Anybody who believes that this current squad is good enough to survive this division is I am afraid deluded and its time for the management to make some tough decisions. Either they want league football or they don't and maybe they realise that a league side in the bay is perhaps unsustainable. We will see.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Oct 18, 2009 12:03:37 GMT
Pete I do not believe for one second the board feel that league football is unsustainable in the Bay and it is their aim to strengthen the team now rather than wait until January.
That shows positive intend to make sure league football is held on to and not something to be let go of after all the work and money put into getting the club out of the BSP and back into the football league.
Its strange really that in some games the players look good enough to at least make sure we do not take the drop back into the BSP, while in other games they look like BSP players who are struggling to make the step up.
It was only right and fair to give the players a chance to see if they could make the step up into league football and its clear that some and not all, have shown its maybe a step to far.
I do think in games like yesterdays the formation exposed some players weaknesses far more and only because using that system we failed to play to the players strengths and left them far to exposed and the result was they struggled more than they might have done, than if we had played a system better suited to the players and the team as a whole.
One game Nico gets great praise and the next having no cover to help him out, his lack of pace puts him under pressure to deal with one or two players at the same time without the help he should be getting.
He has clever feet and and is good on the ball and we have depended so much on his free kicks and throw-ins. but yesterday he had no one close to pass to out of defense and had to hit the ball long.
There was no player running out wide to try and get on the end of Nico's balls( no jokes please) and so he had to pump them toward Sills or Benyon in the middle and so often we then lost the ball and found it coming back at us far to quickly.
Nico made good use of balls down the channels when he had willing runners like Green to go and get on the end of the ball, but he has gone and there are no players I can think at the club who could make the runs with pace up front to win those balls.
I would expect some news this week about a few players coming in, as has been said they do need to be proven league players and not young hopefuls. Watching Danny Mills yesterday I felt he may come good one day, but he got knocked off the ball a few times just like Benyon does and I still feel its better for Mills and the club if he went back to his own club soon.
We can't afford to be picking up just one point at a time per a game, that will see us relegated for sure, keep the faith things are about to turn the corner and the board will make sure of that.
|
|
hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Oct 18, 2009 12:15:48 GMT
I would agree that Danny Mills seems to be pretty much a waste of time being here. he might be good one day but what I have seen of him so far - admittedly not much - there has not been one sniff of potential and you wonder why on earth Peterborough paid good money for him. So many players we seem to sign in the last season or so and then discard. If I was the board and I was going to be giving Buckle funds to improve the squad, I would want to make sure that no more players like Rice, Banim, Christie, Adams, Hodges, Thompson, Carayol, Joyce, Green etc etc are signed.
Buckle's early signings proved to be very successful, but too many over the last 18 months have proven to be unsuccessful.
|
|
petef
Match Room Manager
Posts: 4,626
|
Post by petef on Oct 18, 2009 12:20:41 GMT
Dave you saw it the same as me and Bucks should have changed it earlier it just wasnt working. The defense had no other option other than to hoof it to Sills or Rendell. The only way a system like that can possibly work is if you have capable ala Alex Russell, Jason Fowler type midfield players demanding the ball from the wing backs and play "through" the oposition. We simply do not have the players to do that The Wroe Thompson Hargreaves midfield is simply not up to it and the way there forwards waltzed through our midfield at times was simpy embrrasing. It was exactly the same last year but with less able opponents we got away with it and our home form was pretty poor you have to admit. This is an area that we have to get right and quickly to. Time is ticking.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Oct 18, 2009 12:24:27 GMT
Hector I know Merse has never agreed with my views about Mills going back and I'm sure one day he may well end up playing in a much higher league.
I take the view that has we have our backs to the wall, do not have the funds we would like to have, we really can't afford luxury's by having players here who can't come on and do a job for us out on the pitch.
With players out on loan and I don't agree with a few of the loans, we at this time have a bench where there is no one on it, who you feel can come on and turn a game around for us.
Well we did yesterday maybe, but only because we did not start with the players we maybe should have and it cost us dearly as we surrendered large parts of the pitch and ended up be dominated all over it.
|
|
|
Post by goltaa on Oct 18, 2009 13:40:57 GMT
First post time.
Now......I am usually extremely positive when it comes to the footie, but yesterday I found myself getting extremely frustrated with the constant hoofing of the ball to a random area in the final third of the field. The change in formation didn't really work and I agree that it took too long to change it. Mind you even when we play with "wingers" we still hoof the ball up the centre.
I disagree with the above poster who says we do not have a ball playing midfielder. I believe Nicky Wroe is that person. He has the football brain and attitude to control the game. I really think that because of the style we play he is being forced to play a role not suited to him. Saying that we certainly do need better quality players but he is certainly not one that needs replacing.
Another point is we never dominate games, which, especially at home, I would expect us to do.
And please Mr Buckle play Charnock every match, by far our best quality centre back. The other should be Mark Ellis on the first class displays he has put in. Now just don't start me on Nicholson.......
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,227
|
Post by rjdgull on Oct 18, 2009 14:43:02 GMT
First post time. Now......I am usually extremely positive when it comes to the footie, but yesterday I found myself getting extremely frustrated with the constant hoofing of the ball to a random area in the final third of the field. The change in formation didn't really work and I agree that it took too long to change it. Mind you even when we play with "wingers" we still hoof the ball up the centre. I disagree with the above poster who says we do not have a ball playing midfielder. I believe Nicky Wroe is that person. He has the football brain and attitude to control the game. I really think that because of the style we play he is being forced to play a role not suited to him. Saying that we certainly do need better quality players but he is certainly not one that needs replacing. Another point is we never dominate games, which, especially at home, I would expect us to do. And please Mr Buckle play Charnock every match, by far our best quality centre back. The other should be Mark Ellis on the first class displays he has put in. Now just don't start me on Nicholson....... Good first post. Interestingly, the League Paper gave Nicky Wroe a top rating of 9 and put him in the Division 2 team of the day! Couldn't see that myself yesterday However, at his best he is constantly looking for the ball before distributing it onwards. Can be a box to box player and before long will score a goal from inside his own half. Poke got an eight rating. Agree with your point about Charnock. Regardless of his quality, having a left sided player to cover for Nico surely is a must. Buckle thought so last year with Hargreaves and Hodges. When we have four ar the back, would like to see Ellis and Charnock play together as that would at least give us some pace to defend with.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Oct 18, 2009 15:31:04 GMT
Rob, Mark Ellis has a very big heart and is very brave and will stick his head in where it hurts to win headers etc. Just look at how many he won in yesterday’s game for a start, but he can only head the ball so far and when the ball is on the floor, he will look to just put his foot through it and try and clear it from the danger area.
Yesterday when he won his headers they dropped near the halfway line, Morecambe players were standing their completely unmarked and just feeding the ball back toward our goal. We need to be in there winning the balls when Ellis wins his headers, Mark may never be the sort of player who will provide great balls out from the back, but in saying that when he has had time on the ball at the back, he has mostly played a good pass to a team mate.
What Mark Ellis has is the mentality to fight and win the ball and get it clear, the team as a whole need to complete the job Mark has done by then winning the ball and start our own attack from there.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Oct 18, 2009 18:13:19 GMT
Mark Ellis has a very big heart and is very brave and will stick his head in where it hurts to win headers etc. Just look at how many he won in yesterday’s game for a start, but he can only head the ball so far and when the ball is on the floor, he will look to just put his foot through it and try and clear it from the danger area. Which poses the question to which the answer beggars belief and that is "Just what did a Premiership club (Bolton Wanderers) see in him that suggested he had the potential to be a player at that level?"Now don't get me wrong, I think he could be a passable lower division central defender; but as I said yesterday he has the heart of a lion but the brain of a donkey..................composed defender along the lines of a Jimmy Dunne, Dave Stocks or John Bond for that matter he certainly is not ~ but he could turn out to be better than many!
|
|
|
Post by petergodfrey on Oct 18, 2009 18:56:20 GMT
Tend to agree with goltaa, I must say. I believe Wroe has the best football brain in the squad - he's still young and picking up the pace of L2 football. I would keep Charnock in as well - we played really well with three centre backs in the second half at Notts Co and managed to make a number of clear chances, so I can't see the problem with playing basically the same system at home. As for Ellis, his main job is to keep them out and he does that really well, with the occasional goal thrown in too. What really worries me at the moment is the bench. When I saw the line-up for yesterday's game my heart sank i.e. it was far too lightweight with Mills ( best of luck to the lad but I've said what I think about him in our situation before) and Taylor. What's more we had two cb's on the bench too, Charnock and Toddy - a waste of one spot if you ask me !
|
|