rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,227
|
Post by rjdgull on Sept 24, 2020 14:16:18 GMT
Ditto and Ditto. Technically you and I are in an area of rising cases but it is such a low threshold?..,...
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,227
|
Post by rjdgull on Sept 26, 2020 7:51:43 GMT
link - Stockport one of the areas now with further restrictions and shows why a National League cannot currently work as away support will always try to sneak in, even with limited crowds. Over half the cases in Devon in the past week are from new students at Exeter University bringing the virus with them from areas with higher rates and of course they are in the age group with the highest rates themselves.
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
Member is Online
|
Post by Rob on Sept 26, 2020 21:33:34 GMT
Low
In England, there are no local authority areas currently classified as low. This is to reflect the general increase in infection rate across the country. In the current environment it is not considered appropriate for anywhere in England to be deemed ‘low’ risk.
Copy pasted that from App notes.
|
|
|
Post by stefano on Sept 26, 2020 21:51:44 GMT
I know that Rob just shows what a load of bollocks it all is! 😉🏉
There has not been a covid death in a Devon hospital for 3 months now, and last week Devon had 96 positive tests for the virus. I am of course no expert but to me that is low risk given that Devon is a huge county.
Wales which is using the same App has got a category of low. Wales clearly has a much bigger problem with the virus than the Devon and Cornwall area of England with several local lockdown restrictions in place.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2020 9:16:53 GMT
A stunning success in the never ending battle against the killer plandemic sweeping across Britain. But Boris's news conference today won't be solely to celebrate this latest achievement, but to inform us what more can be done. Just through locking up those party loving and Covid spreading students, along with a 10pm pub closing time to get everyone on the streets, buses, and underground at the same time, we've defeated that frightening 'doubling' figure for the time being, as well as proving how much safer it must be to organise your late drinking sessions with friends, at places other than pubs and away from the prying eyes of Covid Marshals. Surely we can't let this good work go to waste with reckless talk of allowing the students back out to spread Covid to all corners of the UK at Christmas ? However, would their incarceration be more palatable for them, if the rest of us, including their parents back at home, made more sacrifices ? It might be a token gesture, but it would mean a lot to the students I'm sure. Let's see if Boris and his advisers can think up something to enable us to demonstrate greater solidarity with the country's students. He'll let us know later.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,227
|
Post by rjdgull on Sept 30, 2020 12:54:20 GMT
A stunning success in the never ending battle against the killer plandemic sweeping across Britain. But Boris's news conference today won't be solely to celebrate this latest achievement, but to inform us what more can be done. Just through locking up those party loving and Covid spreading students, along with a 10pm pub closing time to get everyone on the streets, buses, and underground at the same time, we've defeated that frightening 'doubling' figure for the time being, as well as proving how much safer it must be to organise your late drinking sessions with friends, at places other than pubs and away from the prying eyes of Covid Marshals. . Funny, I got 134 on 18 September and 266 on 26 September. Depend what figures you use. If you look at people on hospital with Covid it was 1020 on 18 Sept and 1727 on 26 September and 2049 yesterday. With the increase in cases only going in one direction I am afraid....
|
|
|
Post by swatcat on Oct 27, 2020 23:14:27 GMT
We need a vaccine - most of the headline projects target antibody immunity which FADES - see the DT yesterday :- "Immunity to coronavirus may only last a matter of a months, according to new research that could hinder the rollout of a successful vaccine. A study by Imperial College London, which involved 365,000 people, showed that antibodies in the population fell by more than a quarter in just three months. Scientists said the findings suggested a "rapid" decline in immunity – which could mean that even if a successful vaccine is found, it might have to be administered twice a year. The mass research indicated that, by last month, fewer than one in 20 people had developed antibodies to Covid. Commissioned by the Department of Health, it is part of the largest piece of a research programme informing Government policies. Its findings showed that by June, after the first wave of the pandemic, just six per cent of the population had developed antibodies, which suggest some level of protection against the virus. Three months later, that figure had dropped to 4.4 per cent, with most of the decline happening within just six weeks. Scientists said the findings showed Britain is "miles off" achieving herd immunity, which they warned might never be reached without a vaccine. However, the research did not examine the role played by other forms of immunity. SOME SCIENTISTS BELIEVE THE PART PLAYED BY T-CELLS – a type of white blood cell that helps the immune system fight off viruses and is linked with prior infections by common colds – could be more crucial in fighting the virus. Scientists analysed home fingerprick test samples from hundreds of thousands of adults to establish "detectable antibody levels" over a period of three months, and found levels fell by 26.5 per cent overall. The largest fall was among those most vulnerable to serious illness from Covid. Among those aged 75 and over, antibody levels fell by 39 per cent, while a drop of only 15 per cent was seen in those aged between 18 and 24. Researchers stressed that it is not yet known what level of antibody response is required to protect against reinfection – meaning it is possible that even levels of antibodies that were not found by the tests were offering some protection. But they said the findings suggested a significant rapid decline in immunity, raising the prospect that those infected by Covid could suffer repeat infections in further waves. The possibility that a vaccine may have to be administered as often as every six months increases the scale of the challenge ahead. However, the researchers said vaccines may prove more powerful than natural immunity. The sharpest fall was seen in those most in need of protection, with antibody levels among the over-75s reducing by close to 40 per cent between June and September." The CAPS are mine for you. GLA www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/10/27/covid-immunity-may-last-months-study-finds/
|
|
|
Post by swatcat on Oct 27, 2020 23:19:12 GMT
T-cell immunity is more effective and long lasting. The UK Govt have given GBP 2.7 million to Scancell / Notts Uni for this project, ( Oxford Uni/Astra Zeneca got GBP 100 million).
Sky News JUNE 11th . . .
|
|
|
Post by stewart on Nov 24, 2020 0:59:37 GMT
I have decided to re-open this thread because I am completely puzzled by claims that these vaccines are "effective".
Before I ask the question, I must point out that I am a total ignoramus as far as scientific matters are concerned. At school I took a mock 'O' level exam in chemistry and got 15%. For me, lessons in the lab consisted of mixing together a number of coloured liquids and seeing what happened. However, before it is thought that I am a total moron, I should add that I did get 'A' grades in 'A' level French, Spanish and Latin, so clearly my bread was overwhelmingly buttered on one side.
So the question is, how can these drug companies report that their vaccines are 70%, 90% or any % effective when they have been injected only in the last few days? I'm sure that there must be someone out there with the necessary epidemiological knowledge who can explain it to me in layman's terms. Come on, Swatcat, you seem to have above average knowledge of all this galimatias, what am I not understanding?
|
|
|
Post by stefano on Nov 24, 2020 7:27:48 GMT
Well I am no expert either Stewart but here from a fellow layman is how I understand it to be, and I am quite happy to be corrected by swatcat or indeed anybody else.
The test injections have lasted many months and the numbers involved as guinea pigs varies with the 3 vaccines announced so far to be in the latter stages before authorisation. Volunteers were injected, some with the vaccine under development and some with a placebo. They then monitor how many of their volunteers go on to develop covid. To make it easy as an example,let us say that 100 volunteers develop covid. If 10% of those are volunteers who had the vaccine and the rest had the placebo, basically nothing, then they rate the effectiveness of the vaccine as 90%.
That rate is quite good as the flu vaccine (which changes every year depending which strains are in general circulation) is only 40% to 60% effective.
My main doubt is the time scale they have squeezed it in to. Normally it takes at least 10 years to develop a vaccine which is both safe and effective. Because of the urgency with this one the timescales do not allow any assessment of long term side effects (there may not be any but if there are it is impossible to know). The vaccine will not eliminate covid. It is here to stay (Spanish flu of 1918 which killed over 50 million worldwide and Hong Kong flu of 1968 which killed over 1 million worldwide still circulate as seasonal variants).
These things do not just go away, we learn to live with them. Smallpox is the only virus which has been totally eliminated by a vaccine, and that took almost 200 years from the development of the vaccine. The rest including chicken pox (very effective 98% successful vaccine) and bubonic plague (largely kept under control with anti biotics) are still with us.
Mention of Spanish flu always makes me think of comparisons as I have my doubts whether in 100 years time covid will make it into the history books other than as a footnote explanation of the political and economic meltdown which resulted. With a worldwide population of 1.8 billion at the time of the Spanish flu compared to 7.8 billion now, it would require 216 million covid deaths worldwide for covid to have an equivalent death rate. So far after almost a year it is about 1.5 million world wide. It is not going to make it.
Well those are my thoughts but with an emphasis that I have no expertise either as a scientist or medical expert (my mother being a nurse for 53 years doesn't count!!), and from a political perspective I certainly do not envy those faced with the problem.
I shall be having the covid vaccine as soon as it is available. It is the way ahead for society as a step in learning to live with this virus.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,227
|
Post by rjdgull on Nov 24, 2020 7:48:56 GMT
From the top of my head it is based on phase 3 trials over the last couple of months where so many thousands of people are injected with the vaccine but half of which are in a controlled placebo group. The trial then monitors how many people in each group get COVID-19 and based on these relative numbers you can get a percentage of how effective it is.
Edit: just read Stefano’s post who explains it a lot better!
|
|
|
Post by plainmoorpete on Nov 24, 2020 17:15:18 GMT
These things do not just go away, we learn to live with them. Smallpox is the only virus which has been totally eliminated by a vaccine, and that took almost 200 years from the development of the vaccine. The rest including chicken pox (very effective 98% successful vaccine) and bubonic plague (largely kept under control with anti biotics) are still with us. Indeed it wasn't until approximately 200 years after Edward Jenner discovered a vaccine for smallpox that it was totally eradicated from the planet but some qualification of that statement is needed. The developed world profited greatly from the vaccine but it wasn't until 1967 that a concerted effort was made to eradicate the disease in Africa and Asia. The last naturally occurring outbreak of smallpox was recorded in 1977 and it was declared totally eradicated in 1979. Just 12 years to wipe out a disease with a 30% mortality rate is quite imprevious.
|
|
|
Post by stefano on Nov 24, 2020 17:29:53 GMT
In my view it doesn't really matter when a concerted effort was made it still took almost 200 years from the development of a vaccine against smallpox to it being totally eradicated as a disease.
It remains the case that smallpox is the only disease totally eradicated by a vaccine....it therefore follows that covid is very unlikely to be eradicated and that, as we have with many other potentially fatal diseases, we will have to learn to live with it.
Valid points though plainmoorpete as always....
|
|
|
Post by plainmoorpete on Nov 24, 2020 19:21:13 GMT
In my view it doesn't really matter when a concerted effort was made it still took almost 200 years from the development of a vaccine against smallpox to it being totally eradicated as a disease. It remains the case that smallpox is the only disease totally eradicated by a vaccine....it therefore follows that covid is very unlikely to be eradicated and that, as we have with many other potentially fatal diseases, we will have to learn to live with it. Valid points though plainmoorpete as always.... A major reason, perhaps 'the' reason, why smallpox was eradicated is the fact that it only occurs in humans so there is no danger of it being passed on to another species where it could mutate and be passed back (as with Danish mink for example). As you correctly say covid-19 will always be with us, largely due to its ability to mutate,but hopefully we will be able to keep it in check with a vaccine.
|
|
|
Post by stewart on Nov 25, 2020 0:44:50 GMT
From the top of my head it is based on phase 3 trials over the last couple of months where so many thousands of people are injected with the vaccine but half of which are in a controlled placebo group. The trial then monitors how many people in each group get COVID-19 and based on these relative numbers you can get a percentage of how effective it is. Edit: just read Stefano’s post who explains it a lot better! Some good answers to my question here, but I'm still not convinced how it is supposed to work. Once the thousands of people have been injected with the vaccine, what are they supposed to do? Are they instructed, on the one hand, to continue to wash hands, socially distance, etc., or, on the other, are they deliberately exposed to the virus to see how many of them remain well? Or do they simply remain within a hospital bubble until the process has been completed? None of these courses of action seem conclusive to me, and I am just as confused. Many years ago, a family member of mine was diagnosed with the early, but stable, stages of polio when he was a child. He received a vaccine but his condition eventually worsened into a full blown case. Did the vaccine cause this degeneration, or would it have happened anyway, are questions which the medical experts could never answer. This is why I have always been, and always will be, very wary of vaccinations whose effect cannot be guaranteed. I realise that I am comparing a physical disability with a virus, but the fact remains that nobody will know exactly what is being pumped into their body, despite favourable percentages. It seems months since I had anything to say about football, as the fat controller (Trump) and now the virus have totally distracted me. The forthcoming match against Wrexham could prove to be the acid test. Win that, and who knows?
|
|