joebarlow
TFF member
Asperges and proud
Posts: 166
|
Post by joebarlow on Aug 10, 2008 11:50:03 GMT
So 1-1 at Histon isnt the best result we could of got seeing as we may have been more dominent, but not the worst. If we take our chances more than we will have no problem. Woking will not be any push over but it is easily possible to win. If Bucks gets the right combination upfront then we`ll be fine. Lets get some support for the lads, they need it. Torquay United v. Woking Date:12th August Kick-off: 7.45pm Venue: Plainmoor (Torquay) Joe I have changed the time, its 7.45pm and not 3pm Dave R
|
|
|
Post by romfordkev on Aug 10, 2008 16:31:13 GMT
So 1-1 at Histon isnt the best result we could of got seeing as we may have been more dominent, but not the worst. If we take our chances more than we will have no problem. Woking will not be any push over but it is easily possible to win. If Bucks gets the right combination upfront then we`ll be fine. Lets get some support for the lads, they need it. Torquay United v. Woking Date:12th August Kick-off: 7.45pm Venue: Plainmoor (Torquay) Joe I have changed the time, its 7.45pm and not 3pm Dave R It's just a shame the thread title has THE WRONG FIXTURE on it, eh Dave??!!
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Aug 10, 2008 16:42:10 GMT
Poor Joe did his best, this board has now been changed so only staff can start the threads, so If it is wrong it will be my fault ;D
|
|
joebarlow
TFF member
Asperges and proud
Posts: 166
|
Post by joebarlow on Aug 10, 2008 21:09:19 GMT
Sorry. I shall go in my room and cry my eyes out Well now at least it is the correct title, ay
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,227
|
Post by rjdgull on Aug 12, 2008 8:34:53 GMT
At last - a home league game; the first since Crawley where I thought Tyrone Thompson played very well against us and now seems to be playing very well for us. The first competitive home game since Exeter where Wayne Carlisle came on and changed the game so drastically Hopefully he can now do similar for us. I am fairly confident of both a good performance and result tonight and hopefully this will banish what to me is the negativity of some fans talking about assessing the situation after 12 games Obviously, this arbitrary12 game mark has arisen because some fans are unsatisfied with the performances so far! But with the first home game of the season tonight how anyone can make a reasonable and balanced assessment is beyond me, particularly as the majority of fans will not have seen a competitive game yet. By all means lets talk about the team and management after 12 games if things aren't working but to talk about talking about this is in my mind premature and gives the impression of setting a deadline which IMO is not justified and certainly not helpful. By all means be critical and enter into debate in the short term but maybe this could be more constructive in some instances - we all want the same thing after all. OK - Rant over! The point I really wanted to make was let's all get down to Plainmoor tonight and support the team and then talk football after.
|
|
|
Post by tufcwewillbeback on Aug 12, 2008 14:00:50 GMT
Despite Adams return from illness ,the official Tufc site reports that Buckle will pick the XI from the same 16.
"Gulls boss Paul Buckle will pick his starting eleven for tonight's Plainmoor clash with Woking from the same sixteen players who formed the squad at Histon on the opening day of the season last Saturday".
This would also mean no Woods, Ellis or Robertson in the XI. Presumably, therefore, Hargreaves remains at centre back.
Personally, id be happy to see him continue there.
Thoughts?............
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2008 15:11:11 GMT
I will wait until I see Hargreaves play to night before I give my view. On the radio Dave Thomas, said he played very well but some on here said he was very poor. So as I say I will watch with interest tonight.
|
|
|
Post by andygulls on Aug 12, 2008 15:19:28 GMT
Despite Adams return from illness ,the official Tufc site reports that Buckle will pick the XI from the same 16. "Gulls boss Paul Buckle will pick his starting eleven for tonight's Plainmoor clash with Woking from the same sixteen players who formed the squad at Histon on the opening day of the season last Saturday". This would also mean no Woods, Ellis or Robertson in the XI. Presumably, therefore, Hargreaves remains at centre back. Personally, id be happy to see him continue there. Thoughts?............ Bucks knows this league and knows what Hargreaves is capable of. It will take Greavsie a little while to settle into the role in a competitive environment. The one thing we can count on is 100% commitment. Perhaps more interesting is the fact that Brough retains a place in the squad and 3 of the defenders from last season will again view the game from the stands. Lets hope for a good game and the right result tonight. It would be nice is the crowd was boosted by some of those holidaying in the bay who must be desperate for some form of entertainment where the weather will not be the primary factor
|
|
|
Post by tufcwewillbeback on Aug 12, 2008 15:44:45 GMT
Despite Adams return from illness ,the official Tufc site reports that Buckle will pick the XI from the same 16. "Gulls boss Paul Buckle will pick his starting eleven for tonight's Plainmoor clash with Woking from the same sixteen players who formed the squad at Histon on the opening day of the season last Saturday". This would also mean no Woods, Ellis or Robertson in the XI. Presumably, therefore, Hargreaves remains at centre back. Personally, id be happy to see him continue there. Thoughts?............ Bucks knows this league and knows what Hargreaves is capable of. It will take Greavsie a little while to settle into the role in a competitive environment. The one thing we can count on is 100% commitment. Perhaps more interesting is the fact that Brough retains a place in the squad and 3 of the defenders from last season will again view the game from the stands. Lets hope for a good game and the right result tonight. It would be nice is the crowd was boosted by some of those holidaying in the bay who must be desperate for some form of entertainment where the weather will not be the primary factor It only says that the XI will be picked from the 16, Adams or the three defenders therefore, could be named on the bench. We'll have to wait and see... I have to say that, from what I have seen so far, Brough is not a good defensive option or midfield option. Against Bristol Rovers he played with Adams in midfield for the 2nd half. He was inferior to Adams in fitness, movement, distribution, control and ball winning, so I think Adams would be unlucky to not make the bench if he does. To be fair it is early so I dont want to be slating Brough before he has played any competitve football but he certainly still needs to prove himself.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Aug 12, 2008 16:59:42 GMT
I will wait until I see Hargreaves play to night before I give my view. On the radio Dave Thomas, said he played very well but some on here said he was very poor. I know this will invite ridicule, but I would agree with Dave Thomas on this one and we both had a balanced view of his whole performance as we watched from the half way line whereas many of those who made comment would have viewed procedings from behind one goal. How the hell can they give an informed view of how he played at the other end of the pitch then? I did feel he showed certain indecision, which was understandable in the circumstances and to some extent he was then looking to Hodges for guidance. But they have to be given time to build up an understanding which will come sooner rather than later given the overall experience and intelligence of the two players concerned................just Sod's Law that when there was a misunderstanding it cost a last minute goal on Saturday!
|
|
|
Post by tufcwewillbeback on Aug 12, 2008 17:59:28 GMT
I will wait until I see Hargreaves play to night before I give my view. On the radio Dave Thomas, said he played very well but some on here said he was very poor. I know this will invite ridicule, but I would agree with Dave Thomas on this one and we both had a balanced view of his whole performance as we watched from the half way line whereas many of those who made comment would have viewed procedings from behind one goal. How the hell can they give an informed view of how he played at the other end of the pitch then? I did feel he showed certain indecision, which was understandable in the circumstances and to some extent he was then looking to Hodges for guidance. But they have to be given time to build up an understanding which will come sooner rather than later given the overall experience and intelligence of the two players concerned................just Sod's Law that when there was a misunderstanding it cost a last minute goal on Saturday! I saw Hargreaves at the back against Bristol Rovers and I actually thought he played pretty well then. He was our player of the season last season and, despite his age, I still think that he is the best central midfielder we have and would be utilised much better there. However, last season we had periods where we struggled at the back and none of the other defenders did enough to show that they could successfully partner Todd. Therefore, due to the fact that Hargreaves is a very good player, it should mean that he can be a success, if he can adapt. Wroe and Thompson both look very good midfield options and I think Buckle has confidence that Hargreaves is therefore not absolutley neccesary there while a partner for Todd is. So far Brough has shown himself to be no better as a defensive option than the players mentioned above (Those who we already had last season). Therefore, unless Buckle signs a new, natural centre back, such as Brett Johnson, who we missed out on, then he probably feels that Hargreaves has the potential to be the best partner to Todd. Often, good players are tried in new positions by managers looking to sort out weaknesses in teams. It worked with Lee Mansell last season and Hargreaves is a better and more experienced player than him. I, therefore, feel that Buckle would be right to persist with Hargreaves at the back. If he doesnt feel that he is doing a good enough job in 3 or 4 weeks time he can make changes then. For now, he clearly feels that Hargreaves is capable of adapting to the new role and he can only do that if Buckle continues to give him the chance to. I am going to be bold and say that, come the end of the season, we will be voting for, CENTRE BACK, Hargrevaes as player of the season for the second season running. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Enzo
TFF member
Posts: 283
|
Post by Enzo on Aug 12, 2008 18:16:44 GMT
I will wait until I see Hargreaves play to night before I give my view. On the radio Dave Thomas, said he played very well but some on here said he was very poor. I know this will invite ridicule, but I would agree with Dave Thomas on this one and we both had a balanced view of his whole performance as we watched from the half way line whereas many of those who made comment would have viewed procedings from behind one goal. How the hell can they give an informed view of how he played at the other end of the pitch then? I did feel he showed certain indecision, which was understandable in the circumstances and to some extent he was then looking to Hodges for guidance. But they have to be given time to build up an understanding which will come sooner rather than later given the overall experience and intelligence of the two players concerned................just Sod's Law that when there was a misunderstanding it cost a last minute goal on Saturday! Histon was the only time I have seen him Hargreaves at centre back and I was not impressed at all. However, I was not overly impressed with Todd on Saturday either.......and the defence in general. Maybe in time things will improve and they will gel. Hargreaves is a good pro and the type of player we want in the team. I hope he comes good. On a wider point, what are your thoughts on the manner in which Buckle has settled for Hargreaves at centre back?..........As a club we now have Woods, Robertson, Ellis and Brough who have all been signed, re-signed or had contracts extended under PB. With just a few days to go before the season he also tried to sign another centre back? It seems a little strange to me. I hope the fact that we reportedly went for the player (can't remember his name) last week is an indication that if Buckle sees a player that he rates, he will go for him........rather than an indication that he is not satisfied with the present set up.
|
|
|
Post by tufcwewillbeback on Aug 12, 2008 18:39:52 GMT
I know this will invite ridicule, but I would agree with Dave Thomas on this one and we both had a balanced view of his whole performance as we watched from the half way line whereas many of those who made comment would have viewed procedings from behind one goal. How the hell can they give an informed view of how he played at the other end of the pitch then? I did feel he showed certain indecision, which was understandable in the circumstances and to some extent he was then looking to Hodges for guidance. But they have to be given time to build up an understanding which will come sooner rather than later given the overall experience and intelligence of the two players concerned................just Sod's Law that when there was a misunderstanding it cost a last minute goal on Saturday! Histon was the only time I have seen him Hargreaves at centre back and I was not impressed at all. However, I was not overly impressed with Todd on Saturday either.......and the defence in general. Maybe in time things will improve and they will gel. Hargreaves is a good pro and the type of player we want in the team. I hope he comes good. On a wider point, what are your thoughts on the manner in which Buckle has settled for Hargreaves at centre back?..........As a club we now have Woods, Robertson, Ellis and Brough who have all been signed, re-signed or had contracts extended under PB. With just a few days to go before the season he also tried to sign another centre back? It seems a little strange to me. For me, Ellis and Robertson could be good in the future but have alot to learn and are not ready to play as first team regulars for a team trying to get promoted. Woods, like Robertson, has been linked with a move away from plainmoor, therefore, Bucks clearly was'nt impressed enough last season with him. Brough has simply not proved himself to the fans yet. I dont know what Buckle feels about him because he sees him train every day. We dont, so its to early for us to judge him yet. Plus, Hargreaves is naturally a left sided player.
|
|
|
Post by tufcwewillbeback on Aug 12, 2008 18:42:35 GMT
No changes tonight. Im happy with this as I have said I would be. Im really dissapointed not to be able to go tonight but will make up for it on monday. I would really like to know later though, what people have thought about the team. Im sure that there will be lots of reports.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Aug 12, 2008 18:47:49 GMT
what are your thoughts on the manner in which Buckle has settled for Hargreaves at centre back?.......... Hargreaves is nigh on 37, and at the end of last season he looked jaded and shot. At Wembley he looked 137 to me and to be honest I think he was overused through necessity at a part of the season when we were struggling. Maybe Bucks has said to him "if you can adapt to playing at the back, maybe you can get another two years at this level"This is a tried and trusted way for class players at lower division clubs and I well remember 30 years ago we visited York City who featured international forward Peter Lorimer as sweeper, and we had Bruce Rioch playing the same role for us - both old heads on shot to bits legs! I would take Greavsie extending his Plainmoor career this way, wouldn't you? ................and don't you reckon the way Histon play would seriously examine ANY central pairing?
|
|